Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI) Practice Exam 2025 - Free CHFI Practice Questions and Comprehensive Study Guide

A forensics report may be deemed inadmissible in court if it relies on logical assumptions about the incident timeline without the support of concrete evidence. Courts generally require factual data and verifiable information to substantiate claims. Logical assumptions might be seen as inherently subjective, lacking the necessary rigor and objectivity expected in forensic analysis. In forensic investigations, the timeline must be established based on concrete evidence such as timestamps from logs, file system data, and witness statements rather than assumptions.

In contrast, the inclusion of metadata is essential for assessing the authenticity and integrity of evidence; referential support from extracts is critical for backing claims made in the report; and maintaining a consistent document style is vital for clarity and professionalism in reporting. These elements contribute positively to the credibility of the report and are consistent with the standards expected in a forensic context. Therefore, logical assumptions stand out as a factor that can jeopardize a report's admissibility in court.